Glassnode Latency Monitor — Real-Time Crypto Trading Infrastructure Latency

Live network latency from probes worldwide to crypto trading infrastructure and blockchains (Solana, SUI, Hyperliquid, Arbitrum One, Robinhood Chain, Base, X Layer, Ink, OP Mainnet, ZKsync Era). Built for traders, HFT firms, market makers, and arbitrage operators choosing where to co-locate.

What we measure

Why infrastructure location matters

For trading firms racing to be first into a price move, physical distance to exchange matching engines and blockchain validators dominates total latency. A server in the wrong city can lose by tens to hundreds of milliseconds — enough to lose every arbitrage and MEV opportunity to better-located competitors. This site publishes the actual measured numbers, continuously, so operators can make data-driven hosting decisions instead of guessing.

Probe infrastructure

Probes deployed worldwide across Asia (Tokyo multi-AZ, Seoul, Hong Kong, Singapore), Europe (Amsterdam, Dublin, London, Frankfurt), the Americas (Ashburn, Ohio, Chicago, San Jose, São Paulo), and Oceania/Africa (Sydney, Johannesburg). Probes run on Fly.io and AWS bare-metal instances.

Best Co-location for SUI

SUI requires a quorum of validators by voting power (2f+1) for a transaction to commit. The numbers below show how fast each probe location can reach that threshold, weighted by stake.

What is time-to-quorum?
The latency at which 2/3+1 of total voting power has been reached when ordering validators from fastest to slowest.
Time-to-supermajority
Same idea but the 90% mark — useful for finality-sensitive flows that want headroom above the quorum threshold.
Measurement
TCP connect + TLS handshake to each validator's gRPC port (the real submission path), p50 over the last 90 minutes.
ProbeTime to QuorumTime to 90%MedianMinReachable Power